The Bonaire Climate Case: A Big Moment for Climate Justice in the Kingdom of the Netherlands

The Bonaire Climate Case (Klimaatzaak Bonaire) has quickly become one of the most closely watched climate lawsuits in Europe and the Caribbean. Filed by eight residents of Bonaire together with Stichting Greenpeace Nederland, the case challenges the Dutch government’s responsibility to protect the island’s population from the worsening impacts of climate change. As court hearings took place in The Hague in early October 2025, the case drew attention not only for its human rights arguments, its use of the ICJ's Advisory Opinion, but also for how it bridges the gap between European and Caribbean parts of the Netherlands to achieve equity.

While many climate cases have focused on emissions targets or corporate accountability, the Bonaire Climate Case stands out for highlighting climate inequality within a single state. Bonaire, a low-lying island municipality of the Netherlands, faces increasing heat, sea-level rise, and coral degradation that threaten its ecosystems and livelihoods. Yet, according to the claimants, it receives far less protection and funding than the European part of the country. This lawsuit could redefine how climate obligations are understood across territories, and whose lives and futures they are meant to protect.

What’s at Stake

The plaintiffs argue that the Dutch government has failed to take sufficient action to safeguard Bonaire’s residents, violating their fundamental rights under national and international law. The case raises profound questions about climate justice, equality, and the duties of wealthy nations toward vulnerable communities. It asks whether all Dutch citizens, regardless of geography, are entitled to the same level of protection against climate harm.

The court hearings in The Hague in October 2025 drew widespread media coverage. Lawyers for Greenpeace and the plaintiffs referred to recent international developments, including the International Court of Justice’s Advisory Opinion on Climate Change, to frame the Dutch State’s obligations. That global opinion, delivered earlier this year, set a clear benchmark for what “maximum ambition” should look like in government climate policies.

Why the Bonaire Climate Case Matters

The Bonaire Climate Case could set a precedent extending the logic of the famous Urgenda ruling, which forced the Netherlands to cut emissions more rapidly, to overseas territories. It combines arguments about emissions reduction with demands for concrete adaptation measures such as coastal protection and heat preparedness. The case has also prompted broader debate within the Netherlands about colonial legacies, inequality, and the state’s duty to act in solidarity with all parts of the Kingdom.

As the world’s attention turns to how states implement their climate obligations, this lawsuit stands as a test case for translating global commitments like the Paris Agreement into real protections for vulnerable communities. Regardless of the outcome, it will likely influence legal strategies, academic discussions, and climate policy far beyond Bonaire.

Access the Full (Legal) Case Analysis

Our Climate Court Database contains the full in-depth analysis of the Bonaire Climate Case, including detailed summaries of the legal arguments, the incorporation of the ICJ Advisory Opinion, and its potential implications for international climate law.

Subscribers can access the full case entry, including filings, timeline, and legal reasoning.

Explore the case in our database →